![\"Google](\"https:\/\/images.seroundtable.com\/google-geo-1778859231.jpg\" "\\"Google")
<\/p>
On Friday, Google published a new help document named Optimizing your website for generative AI features on Google Search. This document covers much of what Googlers have said over the years, including a myth-busting section that will trigger some in the industry.<\/p>
Google’s search team posted on LinkedIn about this saying, “It includes guidance to help you focus on what matters most when it comes to SEO and generative AI features, along with myth-busting some common misconceptions and guidance on the importance of providing unique, non-commodity content.”<\/p>
Here is the outline of the content published by Google in this document and the good part, you can send this document to clients or prospects who question your advice or strategy:<\/p>
-
<\/p>
- SEO is relevant for generative AI search, follow Google’s best practices for SEO.<\/li>
<\/p>
- Create valuable, non-commodity content for your audience
-
<\/p>
- Provide a unique point of view<\/li>
<\/p>
- Create non-commodity content that’s helpful, reliable and people-first<\/li>
<\/p>
- Organize content in a way that helps your readers<\/li>
<\/p>
- Add high-quality images and video<\/li>
<\/p>
- Focus on what your users want, and avoid overdoing it<\/li>
<\/p>
- Make sure your AI tools you use follow Google’s guidelines and best practices<\/li> <\/ul> <\/li>
<\/p>
- Build and maintain a clear technical structure
-
<\/p>
- Meet the search technical requirements<\/li>
<\/p>
- Follow crawling best practices<\/li>
<\/p>
- When it comes to semantic HTML, focus on human readability, not code<\/li>
<\/p>
- JavaScript should follow Google’s best practices as well<\/li>
<\/p>
- Provide a good page experience<\/li>
<\/p>
- Reduce duplicate content<\/li> <\/ul> <\/li>
<\/p>
- Optimize your local business and ecommerce details<\/li>
<\/p>
- Mythbusting – what you don’t need to do
-
<\/p>
- You don’t need LLMS.txt files<\/li>
<\/p>
- You don’t need other special markup<\/li>
<\/p>
- You don’t need to “Chunk” content<\/li>
<\/p>
- You don’t need to rewrite content for AI systems<\/li>
<\/p>
- You don’t need to seek inauthentic mentions<\/li>
<\/p>
- You shouldn’t overfocus on structured data<\/li> <\/ul> <\/li>
<\/p>
- Explore agentic experiences<\/li>
<\/p>
- Next steps<\/li> <\/ul>
Here is some of the chatter around this document:<\/p>
Google just put out its first official article on optimizing for AI search (AEO\/GEO)!<\/p>
TL;DR:<\/p>
\u2b50\ufe0f SEO is still the foundation for AI search.<\/p>
\u2b50\ufe0f Create non-commodity, “people-first” content.<\/p>
\u2b50\ufe0f Ignore most “GEO\/AEO hacks like chunking and llms.txt. pic.twitter.com\/YSM4cJgDOX<\/a><\/p>
\u2014 Lily Ray \ud83d\ude0f (@lilyraynyc) May 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
I guess the GEO bros will not be happy pic.twitter.com\/v6jSH2fgoj<\/a><\/p>
\u2014 Pedro Dias (@pedrodias) May 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
\ud83d\udea8 Google has published its official guidance on optimizing for generative AI experiences in Search, including AI Overviews and AI Mode \ud83d\udc47 Going through:<\/p>
1. How SEO is still relevant for generative AI search:<\/p>
The best practices for SEO continue to be relevant because their\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/CrSor7zGfW<\/a><\/p>
\u2014 Aleyda Solis \ud83d\udd4a\ufe0f (@aleyda) May 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
Create valuable, non-commodity content for your audience<\/p>
Google said \ud83d\udc47 pic.twitter.com\/f9gHIztxM5<\/a><\/p>
\u2014 Gagan Ghotra (@gaganghotra_) May 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
And pay particular attention to the “Mythbusting” section. It’s so good. So so good. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>
*No llms.txt needed.
*No chunking needed.
*Seeing inauthentic mentions is risky.
*Don’t overfocus on structured data.
And more… pic.twitter.com\/B2zjuv7rLs<\/a><\/p>\u2014 Glenn Gabe (@glenngabe) May 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
chunking SEOs got chunked by Google today pic.twitter.com\/DLRUUx2JsG<\/a><\/p>
\u2014 Gagan Ghotra (@gaganghotra_) May 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
Happy GEO is Dead Day\ud83e\udd73 #SEO<\/a> #AI<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/I8vChdzcZP<\/a><\/p>
\u2014 Orit Mutznik (@OritSiMu) May 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
It’s far too easy to laden such publications with snarky and critical comments. <\/p>
This is really good to see. Thanks to the @searchliaison.bsky.social (forgive me if I’ve tagged the wrong account) for putting this out.<\/p>
developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/…<\/p>
[image or embed]<\/p>
\u2014 Owain Lloyd-Williams (@owainlloydwilliams.com) May 15, 2026 at 2:04 PM<\/p><\/blockquote>
When Google makes a statement or updates documentation, SEOs be like:<\/p>
– (If it aligns with their opinion) “see even Google says it, so I’ve been right this whole time.”<\/p>
– (if it doesn’t align with their opinion) “see, Google is always lying to us!” https:\/\/t.co\/gsM0wbWBu0<\/p>
\u2014 Mic King (@iPullRank) May 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
Some thoughts on Google’s new guidance on ranking in AI Search – including info on Bing’s blog post about the purpose of the index changing so as to serve for grounding for AI. pic.twitter.com\/dvQT5xdmlV<\/a><\/p>
\u2014 Marie Haynes (@Marie_Haynes) May 15, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
This is classic Googlespeak l, but luckily I\u2019ve spent many years learning the language \ud83d\ude02<\/p>
My interpretation – \u201cinauthentic mentions\u201d probably applies to listicle pages (potentially self-serving ones, but not that\u2019s explicitly stated here), paid\/reciprocal brand mentions on\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/U9DfOoamKB<\/a><\/p>
\u2014 Lily Ray \ud83d\ude0f (@lilyraynyc) May 16, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>
Forum discussion at LinkedIn.<\/p> <\/p><\/div>
- You don’t need LLMS.txt files<\/li>
- Meet the search technical requirements<\/li>
- Provide a unique point of view<\/li>